Most people who miss their target LSAT score don't miss it because the questions are too hard. They miss it because they ran out of time and left points on the table — questions they could have gotten right if only the clock hadn't beaten them. Timing is the quiet score-killer, and the good news is that it's the most trainable part of the test. You can't will yourself to be smarter on test day, but you absolutely can build a timing system that carries you through every section.
This guide gives you a concrete, per-section timing plan built around the current LSAT format, plus the decision rules that separate people who finish comfortably from people who are still on question 19 when the proctor calls time.
Since August 2024, the LSAT consists of two scored Logical Reasoning sections, one scored Reading Comprehension section, and one unscored section used to test future questions. Each section is 35 minutes. The test is scored on the 120–180 scale. Analytical Reasoning — the old "Logic Games" section — has been removed entirely, so if any prep material tells you to budget time for games, it's out of date.
Here's why the format matters for your timing plan: Logical Reasoning now carries twice the weight it used to relative to a single RC section. Your LR timing habits affect two of your three scored sections. Getting fast and accurate at LR isn't just helpful — it's the highest-leverage timing investment you can make.
A Logical Reasoning section is 35 minutes with roughly 25 questions. That gives you about 84 seconds per question if you spread it evenly — but you should never spread it evenly. Early questions in an LR section tend to be shorter and easier; later ones tend to be denser. A smart budget looks more like this:
The goal is to reach the last few questions with a cushion, not a deficit. If you're burning 90 seconds on question 4, you've already lost the race.
RC is 35 minutes with four passages (one of which is the comparative pair). That's about 8 minutes 45 seconds per passage, which you should split roughly as:
Reading slowly enough to actually understand the passage is faster overall than skimming and then re-reading for every question. A clean read that captures the main point, the author's attitude, and the structure pays for itself.
Every question is worth exactly one point. A brutal question 22 is worth the same as a gimme question 3. Yet test-takers routinely sacrifice three easy points at the end of a section by grinding on one hard question in the middle. That's a terrible trade.
Your operating rule: if a question stalls you, move on and flag it. In LR, if you've read the stimulus and answers once and you're still lost after ~20 seconds beyond your average, mark it and go. In RC, if a question requires re-reading half the passage, skip it, answer the cleaner questions for that passage, then return.
This does two things. First, it guarantees you see every question on the page — you can't get a point on a question you never reached. Second, it lets your subconscious keep working on the hard one while you rack up easier points, and you'll often see the answer more clearly on the return pass.
Speed on the LSAT is almost never about reading faster — it's about deciding faster. Slow test-takers usually lose time in three places:
The single most effective drill is timed sections with a review that tracks time, not just accuracy. After every practice section, ask: which questions ate the most clock? Were they the ones I got wrong, or was I spending three minutes on questions I got right anyway? You want to reallocate time toward the hard-and-missable, away from the hard-but-eventually-right.
A common mistake is jumping straight to full-speed timed sections before you've built the fundamentals. That teaches you to be fast and wrong. Use a phased approach:
Timing isn't about rushing — it's about spending your minutes where they earn points. Build the system in practice, and on test day it runs on autopilot while you focus on the reasoning.