UC Davis Law’s first-time bar passage rate sits at about 73%, right in the national band of 75 to 80%. A middle-of-the-pack rate is neither a warning nor a selling point; it is an invitation to look one level deeper, because at this range the state mix and the incoming credentials explain almost everything.
MetricFigureContextFirst-time bar passage73%4 pts below the national midpointNational first-time average~75 to 80%Varies year to yearPrimary jurisdictionCaliforniaVerify in the ABA 509U.S. News rank#30Peer-tier context
It is solidly average, 73% sits inside the national 75 to 80% band. At this range, the state being measured and the credentials of the entering class explain most of the picture, which is why the 509 breakdown matters more than the headline.
For calibration: 73% is 4 points below the national midpoint, a gap small enough that state difficulty alone could account for it.
A bar passage rate is manufactured from three components. The raw material is the entering class, medians in, results out, more correlated than anyone’s marketing admits. The process is the curriculum: curves, writing volume, doctrinal coverage. And the quiet third factor is who gets counted: schools with aggressive academic attrition graduate a pre-filtered cohort, which flatters the rate without improving the teaching. Read all three before crediting any one.
Withheld Tip: compare the school’s rate to the state baselinenot the national one. A 74% rate in a state where the average sitter passes at 60% is excellent; the same 74% where the state average is 85% is a warning. The state bar examiners publish overall pass rates, two minutes of context that reorders most school comparisons.
Like most ABA-accredited schools, UC Davis Law supports bar preparation through commercial-course partnerships, readiness programming, and faculty advising, ask admissions for specifics rather than assuming the label covers the substance.
Keep one eye forward: the licensing exam itself is in transition, with states adopting the NextGen bar exam on a rolling basis through 2028. The emphasis shifts toward applied lawyering skills, which rewards exactly the habit the LSAT should have taught you: training the underlying skill under feedback rather than memorizing around it. Ask any school how its bar curriculum is adapting; the question itself signals you understand what you are buying.
One non-negotiable for evaluating any school: never accept a bar passage rate without its jurisdiction. A naked percentage is a marketing number; a percentage with a state attached is data.
About 73% first-time, in line with the national 75 to 80% average, a figure that means the most once you know which state’s exam it describes and how that state’s baseline runs. The 509 disclosure carries both.
Different inputs, different exams, different denominators. Admitted-student medians drive much of it; state difficulty drives more; and attrition policy quietly shapes who gets counted. Strip those out and the remaining gap, the part that is actually about teaching, is smaller than the raw numbers suggest.
Sometimes. A strong rate built on strong inputs and low attrition is the genuine article; a strong rate built on heavy academic dismissal is a denominator trick. The 509 lets you tell the difference in about ten minutes.
You are about to spend three years learning to interrogate evidence for a living. Start now, on the school itself: jurisdiction, baseline, trend, denominator. A school that welcomes those questions is telling you something. So is a school that doesn’t.