Getting waitlisted feels like admissions purgatory — not a no, not a yes, just a holding pattern that can last until August. The letter of continued interest (LOCI) is your one sanctioned move to change the outcome. Done well, it's the difference between being a name on a list and being the applicant the committee actively wants to admit when a seat opens. Done badly — too long, too desperate, or full of nothing new — it confirms the committee made the right call putting you on hold.
This guide walks you through exactly how to write one that works: when to send it, what belongs in it, a copy-usable structure, a full worked example, and the mistakes that quietly sink most letters.
A letter of continued interest is a brief, professional message — almost always email — that a waitlisted or deferred law school applicant sends to reaffirm interest in a school and provide new information relevant to their candidacy. Its two jobs are simple: (1) tell the school you're still enthusiastic and would attend if admitted, and (2) give the admissions committee something new to weigh. That's it. It is not a reapplication, and it is not the place to relitigate your entire file.
The strategic reality is that waitlists are a yield-management tool. Schools use them to protect their enrollment targets, and they pull from the waitlist when they need bodies in seats. When they go to that list, they favor applicants who have signaled — credibly — that they will actually enroll. A LOCI is how you send that signal in writing.
Send a LOCI when all of the following are true:
Do not send a LOCI if the school forbids follow-up, if you have nothing new to say, or if you're only mildly interested. A generic 'I'm still very interested!' with no substance is worse than silence — it takes up an officer's time and adds nothing.
One or two sentences. Thank them for the continued consideration, name the school specifically, and state that it remains a top choice. If it's your first choice and you'd commit, this is where the enroll pledge lives — lead with strength.
This is the core. Share the concrete new information since you applied: fall or spring grades, a retake score, a promotion, a new leadership role, a completed thesis, a relevant volunteer or professional experience. Quantify where you can ('raised my GPA to 3.85 this semester,' 'now managing a team of six'). New, specific, verifiable — those are the qualities that move a committee.
Explain — with specifics — why this school in particular matches your goals. Name a clinic, a professor whose work aligns with your interests, a joint-degree program, a journal, a geographic or practice-area connection. 'Your strong reputation' is not specific fit. 'I want to work with the Immigration Justice Clinic because I spent last year as a paralegal on asylum cases' is.
Reaffirm your enthusiasm, restate the enroll pledge if you're making one, and thank them again. Keep it warm but professional. End clean.
Use this as a skeleton — then rewrite every line in your own voice with your own facts. A LOCI that reads like a template is a LOCI that gets skimmed and forgotten.
Subject line: Letter of Continued Interest — [Your Full Name], LSAC #[Number]
Dear [Dean of Admissions / Admissions Committee],
Thank you for keeping my application under consideration. [School Name] remains my first-choice law school, and I am writing to reaffirm that I would enroll without hesitation if offered a seat.
Since submitting my application, [specific update: 'I completed my fall semester with a 3.9 GPA, raising my cumulative GPA to 3.72,' or 'I was promoted to Senior Analyst and now lead a team of four.']. [One or two sentences of relevant detail or outcome.]
My interest in [School] is grounded in [specific program, clinic, professor, or opportunity]. [One or two sentences connecting your background and goals to that specific feature — why it fits you and no generic school would.]
Thank you again for your time and continued consideration. I remain deeply committed to attending [School] and would be honored to join the incoming class. Please let me know if I can provide any additional information.
Sincerely,
[Full Name]
[Phone] | [Email] | LSAC #[Number]
The following is a sample letter written to illustrate the method — it uses invented facts to show how the pieces fit together.
Dear Dean Ramirez,
Thank you for keeping my application on the waitlist. Georgetown Law remains my first-choice program, and I am writing to reaffirm that I would enroll immediately if offered admission.
Since I applied in November, I completed my final undergraduate semester with a 4.0, raising my cumulative GPA from 3.61 to 3.68. I also began a full-time role as a legislative aide in my state senator's office, where I now draft constituent policy memos on housing law — the field I intend to practice.
That work is exactly why Georgetown is my top choice. Your Housing Advocacy and Litigation Clinic and the D.C. location would let me build directly on the tenant-rights casework I'm doing now, and Professor Cohen's scholarship on eviction policy maps closely onto my career goals in public-interest housing law.
Thank you again for your consideration. I remain fully committed to Georgetown and would be honored to accept a seat in the incoming class. I'm happy to provide grades, a supervisor reference, or anything else that would help.
Sincerely,
Jordan Ellis
(555) 123-4567 | jordan.ellis@email.com | LSAC #L1234567
Notice what this sample does in under 220 words: leads with a clean enroll pledge, delivers two concrete verifiable updates, ties them to a named clinic and a named professor, and offers to supply supporting materials. No filler, no groveling, no restating the personal statement.
Send your first LOCI shortly after being waitlisted, once you have a real update — often after fall or spring grades post. If the school permits ongoing updates and something significant genuinely changes (a big GPA jump, a higher LSAT, a major new role), a single, brief second update is reasonable. Do not email monthly just to stay top of mind; a steady drip of empty messages annoys rather than persuades. Quality and restraint win.
Applicants tend to treat the waitlist as a passive waiting game. It isn't. When a school goes to its waitlist, it's making a live decision about who to admit — and the applicants it can see clearly, who've signaled real intent and given fresh reasons to say yes, have a structural advantage. Your LOCI is the one document that lets you influence that moment. Written with specificity, brevity, and a credible commitment, it can genuinely change your outcome.