About 68% of Idaho Law graduates report employment ten months out. Stop, before that number does anything to your decision, ask the only question that matters: 68% of what, doing what? A headline employment rate blends every category of outcome into one figure, and the blend is where schools hide their weaknesses and bury their strengths.
MetricFigureContextEmployment rate (10 months)~68%Every category, blendedPrimary placementMoscow and IdahoWhere the pipeline pointsNetwork strengthID in-state, Pacific Northwest, natural resourcesStrongest for matching plans
Taken literally: ten months after graduation, 68% of the class had a job, any kind, any duration, any funder. The figure that should drive your decision is narrower: full-time, long-term, bar-passage-required employment as a share of all graduates, because that category and only that category means practicing law. The rest of the blend, part-time, JD-advantage, school-funded, is context worth reading and discounting.
This is not Idaho Law being evasive; it is the standard format every school reports in, which is exactly why the ABA requires a disclosure that lets you take the blend apart.
The analyst’s read of any employment summary takes four passes. Pass one: compute full-time/long-term/bar-required against the entire class, that ratio is the school’s real product. Pass two: subtract school-funded positions; they are real short-term work and they are not the market hiring. Pass three: weigh the JD-advantage category at a discount, it contains genuine choices and genuine consolations in unknowable proportion. Pass four: locate the jobs. Outcomes are geographic, and a strong pipeline into a city you are leaving is worth little. Ten minutes, four numbers, and the brochure becomes a balance sheet.
Withheld Tip: cross-reference the employment summary against class size over the same years. A “rising” placement rate over a shrinking class can mean fewer jobs, better ratio, arithmetic doing the work that recruiting didn’t.
Employment data only becomes a decision once you add the one variable the school cannot publish: your destination. Placement strength is geographic, here, Moscow and Idaho., and a powerful network in the wrong city is a weak network for you. So invert the usual order, choose the market, then choose the school as the best vehicle into it. Never the reverse.
Around 68% report some form of employment at ten months. The lawyer-specific figure, full-time, long-term, bar-required over the whole class, is the one worth your attention, and it lives in the 509.
Primarily Moscow and Idaho, with particular strength in ID in-state, Pacific Northwest, natural resources. Placement power is concentrated, a strength if that geography is your plan, a discount if it isn’t.
Yes, which is precisely why the 509 lists them on their own line. Count them as support, not demand: useful bridges for the graduates in them, and a deduction from the headline for anyone evaluating the school’s market pull.
The discipline this page teaches, decompose the headline, locate the geography, verify across years, is the same discipline the career itself will demand. Treat the school’s employment summary as your first case file. The applicants who read it that way tend to end up on the right side of the statistics they once scrutinized.