TL;DR: Choose Blueprint if you want a self-paced, digitally-native LSAT course with a structured video curriculum. Choose Princeton Review if you want live-class options, broader in-person availability, and a widely recognized brand with a score-guarantee policy. Both companies have updated materials for the current LSAT format—two scored Logical Reasoning sections and one Reading Comprehension section, fully digital, scored 120–180, with no Logic Games section as of August 2024.

Blueprint vs Princeton Review: which is better for the LSAT?

Blueprint is typically the stronger fit for students who learn well from structured, self-paced video lessons and want a course built specifically around the current digital LSAT. Princeton Review is typically the stronger fit for students who want live instruction, more in-person availability, and a well-known national brand. Neither course is objectively better for every test-taker; the right choice depends on your learning style, budget, and how much live accountability you need.

Blueprint vs Princeton Review at a glance

• Feature: Starting price | Blueprint LSAT: | Princeton Review LSAT:
• Feature: Format | Blueprint LSAT: Self-paced on-demand video; live online option available | Princeton Review LSAT: Self-paced on-demand; live online classes; in-person available in select cities
• Feature: Course access length | Blueprint LSAT: | Princeton Review LSAT:
• Feature: Core materials | Blueprint LSAT: Video lessons, digital lesson books, full-length digital practice exams, drill sets | Princeton Review LSAT: Video lessons, printed/digital workbooks, full-length practice exams, proprietary strategy guides
• Feature: Score guarantee | Blueprint LSAT: | Princeton Review LSAT:
• Feature: Tutoring add-on | Blueprint LSAT: Available | Princeton Review LSAT: Available

This table reflects course structure as generally marketed by each company. Prices, access windows, and guarantee terms change frequently, so treat the numbers above as directional until you verify them on each provider's current enrollment page.

Pricing compared

Neither Blueprint nor Princeton Review publishes a single fixed price; both sell multiple tiers (self-paced, live, tutoring) at different price points that change over time. is the figure to confirm directly with Blueprint before enrolling. is the figure to confirm directly with Princeton Review. Both companies sit in the mid-to-upper tier of LSAT course pricing relative to lower-cost self-paced platforms and higher-cost one-on-one tutoring. If price is your primary constraint, compare the exact current tier you'd actually buy—self-paced tiers are usually far cheaper than live or tutoring-inclusive packages at both companies.

Curriculum, materials & score results compared

Blueprint's curriculum is built around a video-first, workbook-supported model designed natively for self-paced study. Princeton Review's curriculum is built around a broader instructional network that includes live classes taught by instructors, in addition to self-paced video content. Both companies have revised their Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension materials to match the current digital LSAT format, since the test no longer includes a Logic Games section as of August 2024. Neither company has publicly verified score-improvement statistics available to us for this comparison, so we are not citing specific average point gains for either provider; treat any score-improvement percentage you see in marketing as a claim to verify against the provider's own methodology page rather than an independently audited outcome.

Who should choose Blueprint?

Blueprint tends to fit a specific kind of LSAT student well. Consider Blueprint if:

• You prefer learning from structured, sequential video lessons over live lectures.
• You want a self-paced schedule you can speed up or slow down around work, school, or family obligations.
• You like a workbook-style curriculum that pairs each video lesson with practice drills.
• You've tried a generic prep book on your own and want more structure without committing to full one-on-one tutoring.
• You're comfortable self-motivating without a live class schedule holding you accountable.

Who should choose Princeton Review?

Princeton Review tends to fit a different kind of LSAT student well. Consider Princeton Review if:

• You want the option of live, instructor-led classes rather than only pre-recorded video.
• You value studying alongside a cohort of other test-takers on a set schedule.
• You live in or near a city where Princeton Review offers in-person sections and prefer face-to-face instruction.
• You want the reassurance of a widely recognized, decades-old test-prep brand.
• You're deciding between LSAT prep and other standardized tests (GRE, GMAT, MCAT) and want a provider that also covers those exams under one account.

A note from Lovare: Blueprint and Princeton Review are both point solutions—they cover LSAT prep and then your relationship with them typically ends once you submit applications. Lovare Institut's approach is judged on the same criteria you'd use for any course: format fit, materials quality, and price transparency, and we're honest that we're not the right fit for every learner either. Where Lovare differs is continuity—LSAT prep, application strategy, and 1L tools live on one platform instead of three separate purchases, and support doesn't stop at the acceptance letter. If you're comparing LSAT courses broadly rather than just these two, see our full comparison of the best LSAT courses for a side-by-side look at how Blueprint, Princeton Review, 7Sage, and other providers stack up on price and format.

FAQ

Is Blueprint or Princeton Review better for a first-time LSAT taker?

Both work for first-time takers, but Blueprint's self-paced video structure suits students who want to move through material at their own speed, while Princeton Review's live-class option suits students who want scheduled accountability from day one. Neither is inherently better for beginners; the deciding factor is whether you learn faster with structure you control or structure someone else sets for you.

Does Blueprint or Princeton Review cover the current digital LSAT format?

Yes, both companies have updated their curricula for the current digital LSAT. The test is fully digital, scored 120–180, and now consists of two scored Logical Reasoning sections plus one Reading Comprehension section. Logic Games was removed as of August 2024, and legitimate current courses from both providers should no longer teach it as a scored section.

Which course is cheaper, Blueprint or Princeton Review?

We can't state a definitive cheaper option without current verified pricing from both companies. and change periodically, and both companies sell multiple tiers at different price points. Compare the exact tier you intend to buy—self-paced versus live versus tutoring-inclusive—rather than a single headline number.

Do Blueprint and Princeton Review offer score guarantees?

Both companies have historically marketed some form of score-guarantee policy, but the exact terms, eligibility requirements, and score thresholds vary and change over time. and should be confirmed directly on each provider's enrollment page before you rely on a guarantee as a purchase factor.

Can I switch from Princeton Review to Blueprint (or vice versa) if a course isn't working?

Most students who switch providers mid-prep do so because the format—live versus self-paced—wasn't the right fit, not because the content was wrong. If you're several weeks in and not improving, evaluate whether the delivery style is the problem before assuming the content is. Check each provider's current transfer, refund, or pause policy directly, since neither publishes a standardized mid-course switching path.

Is live instruction better than self-paced video for the LSAT?

Neither format is universally better; research on test-prep outcomes generally shows that consistency of practice matters more than delivery format. Live instruction adds accountability and real-time Q&A. Self-paced video adds flexibility and the ability to rewatch difficult concepts repeatedly, which some LSAT students find more valuable for dense Logical Reasoning topics.