.png)
This 7Sage review lands on a clear verdict: at $69 a month for Core it is the strongest list price among full curricula, and at $1 a month for LSAC fee-waiver holders it is not a close call. The gap is accountability, not content. Prices recorded July 26, 2026.
Core is $69 a month, Live is $129 a month and Coach is $299 a month, and LSAC fee-waiver holders pay $1 a month, all recorded from 7Sage's own pricing page on July 26, 2026 (7Sage pricing (https://7sage.com/self-study/pricing)).
That 7Sage fee-waiver rate is the most consequential number on this page and almost nobody mentions it. Twelve months at $1 is a different product category from twelve months at the $69 Core rate, and both figures sit in the table below.
Budget for LawHub separately at $124 a year from LSAC (LSAC LawHub (https://www.lsac.org/lawhub)), as with essentially every provider.
TierPriceSourceCore$69 per monthhttps://7sage.com/self-study/pricingLive$129 per monthhttps://7sage.com/self-study/pricingCoach$299 per monthhttps://7sage.com/self-study/pricingLSAC fee-waiver holders$1 per monthhttps://7sage.com/self-study/pricingLawHub Advantage, separate$124 per yearhttps://www.lsac.org/lawhub
For a self-directed studier who wants structure without a schedule, 7Sage Core at $69 a month is the most defensible list price in the market. For an LSAC fee-waiver holder at $1 a month the question does not need asking.
The strength is the curriculum's completeness and its explanation depth. The design assumption is that you will work through a syllabus on your own initiative, which is a real assumption and not a neutral one.
The gap is accountability. Nothing in the product notices that you have stopped, and the single most common way self-study fails is stopping quietly in week five.
For most people who finish it, yes, on the content. The curriculum covers what the test asks and the explanations are thorough enough that you rarely need a second source.
The word doing the work in that sentence is finish. Completion is the binding constraint on every self-paced product, and it is the thing a 7Sage subscription at any tier cannot supply.
The honest test is your own history. If you have completed a self-paced course of any kind in the last two years, 7Sage alone is a reasonable plan. If you have bought two and finished neither, the missing ingredient is not more curriculum.
Anyone who has not yet taken a timed test under real conditions. You cannot choose a curriculum before you know which section is costing you points, and a month of subscription spent finding out is a month wasted.
Anyone whose problem is a hard pacing collapse rather than a knowledge gap. A curriculum teaches content; a pacing failure is fixed by section-level drilling and a stopwatch.
And anyone shopping in the last four weeks before a test. At that point you need triage rather than a syllabus, and starting a comprehensive course is the wrong shape of intervention.
Two of the seven, and it is worth naming plainly. Princeton Review publishes no tuition price anywhere on its site for any tier (Princeton Review LSAT (https://www.princetonreview.com/law/lsat-test-prep)).
Kaplan publishes some and not others: On Demand at $799, In Person from $1,445 and its 170+ course at $2,099 are listed, while Live Online and every tutoring rate are not (Kaplan LSAT courses (https://www.kaptest.com/lsat/courses/lsat-prep-diy-online)). LSATMax publishes its course prices but not its subscription prices for some tiers (LSATMax plans (https://testmaxprep.com/lsat/solomon-plans)).
Pricing behind a signup form is a choice, and the usual reason for it is that the price varies by who is asking. That is not automatically bad and it does mean you cannot compare without handing over contact details, which is worth knowing before you start.
Price is a poor predictor of outcome, and the intervention literature is unusually blunt about it. Across 28 studies and more than 16,000 participants, test prep as a category produced an overall effect of g = .26, and practice tests on their own produced g = .19 at p = .233, which is not statistically significant, per Hao and colleagues (2025), Review of Educational Research (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/00346543251360775).
More striking for a page about a subscription product: in that same Hao and colleagues analysis, neither contact hours at p = .489 nor program duration in weeks at p = .314 predicted outcomes. Buying more hours is not the mechanism.
What did register in Hao and colleagues was structured practice on the reasoning, with workbooks at g = .40 and explicitly teaching test-taking skills at g = .35. So the question to ask of any product is not how much material it contains but whether it changes how you review.
And review timing is free. Testing yourself beats restudying at g = 0.50 across 61 studies, rising to g = 0.69 when review comes a day or more after the attempt against g = 0.41 under a day, per Rowland (2014), Psychological Bulletin (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25150680/).
We should declare the interest: Lovare is ours. This section exists because a review page that quietly omits the author's own product is doing the same thing it criticizes.
What Lovare is: a free diagnostic that identifies which sections are actually costing you points, a free archetype quiz that names your study failure mode, and one-to-one coaching built around the review method rather than around content delivery. We do not sell a question bank and we do not sell hours of video.
Who it is not for, stated plainly. If you want a large self-serve library to work through alone, a subscription platform is the better buy and costs less.
If you have not yet taken a timed test, coaching is premature and the free diagnostic is the whole of what we would sell you today. And if your problem is that you have not started, no coach fixes that.
We do not publish a coaching price on these pages, because our verified fact set covers competitors' published prices and not our own rate card. The diagnostic is free and the price of anything beyond it is set at the consult.
Each provider below is named somewhere in the text above. The link is its own pricing page, which is where each figure was recorded and where you should check it before buying.
7Sage: https://7sage.com/self-study/pricing. LSAT Demon: https://lsatdemon.com/plans/lsat. Blueprint: https://blueprintprep.com/lsat/online-anytime.
PowerScore: https://powerscore.com/lsat/courses. LSATMax: https://testmaxprep.com/lsat/solomon-plans.
Kaplan: https://www.kaptest.com/lsat/courses/lsat-prep-diy-online. Princeton Review: https://www.princetonreview.com/law/lsat-test-prep.
LSAC's own charges are at LSAC LSAT and CAS fees (https://www.lsac.org/lsat/register-lsat/lsat-cas-fees) and LSAC LawHub (https://www.lsac.org/lawhub). PowerScore's book prices are at PowerScore publications (https://powerscore.com/lsat/publications).
Every figure on this page was taken from the provider's own pricing page and recorded on July 26, 2026. Prep pricing moves more often than anything else we publish, and providers run promotions that are not reflected on their list-price pages.
So treat the numbers here as a snapshot with a date on it, and open the source link beside each one before you buy. We would rather print a dated figure you can check than an undated figure you cannot.
One structural cost sits outside every table on this page. LawHub Advantage costs $124 a year from LSAC and nearly every course requires it as a separate purchase (LSAC LawHub (https://www.lsac.org/lawhub)). Providers quote it inconsistently at $115, $120 and $124; LSAC's own price is the one that governs.
Every LSAC figure on this page was taken from LSAC's own pages and last checked on July 26, 2026. Prices, dates and policies move without notice, so the source link sits next to each number rather than in a bibliography at the bottom.
Where LSAC has not published something, this page says so in those words rather than filling the hole with a plausible number. That is the difference between a gap and a guess, and only one of them is safe to plan around.
At $69 a month for a self-directed studier, yes, and at $1 a month for LSAC fee-waiver holders it is the clearest value in the market. The gap is accountability rather than content.
Core is $69 a month, Live $129 and Coach $299, with LSAC fee-waiver holders at $1 a month, recorded from 7Sage's own pricing page on July 26, 2026. LawHub is a separate $124 a year.
On content, for most people who finish it. Completion is the constraint, not coverage, and no self-paced subscription solves completion.
Yes. LawHub Advantage is $124 a year from LSAC and is required separately by essentially every provider, because courses sell instruction and LSAC sells the official questions.
Anyone who has not taken a timed test yet, anyone whose issue is pacing rather than content, and anyone inside four weeks of a test date who needs triage rather than a syllabus.
Written by Ali, Georgetown Law, founder of Lovare Institut.
August 5, 2026
August 5, 2026