About
What we actually do
If this sentence stops being true, this page is the first thing that changes.
In one paragraph
People applying to law school, people already in it, and the parents paying for one of those. Not firms, not schools as customers, not anybody who has already qualified.
A person reading your file. The tools are free and the platform is inexpensive because the thing worth charging for is somebody who has read four hundred of these telling you the truth about yours.
We advise and edit. We do not ghostwrite. Results are published as medians with dates and cohort size, never as anecdotes, and never with a name attached without written consent.
Six vendors across seven years, and every handoff drops something.
The path to a legal career runs through five separate industries that do not speak to each other: test prep, admissions consulting, outline publishing, career services, bar review. A student assembles six vendors across seven years and every handoff loses something.
That cost falls hardest on people who did not arrive already knowing how any of it works. The ones with a lawyer in the family get told which parts matter. Everybody else pays five times to be told five different things, and finds out what mattered afterwards.
Every engagement is carried by one of these two. Never delegated.
Senior leadership
Founder and principal
Founder of Lovare and architect of its diagnostic method. Built the blind-review system the practice runs on, and reads every file that comes through it personally.
Co-founder and head of career strategy
Author of two books on legal hiring and career strategy, and founder of Legal Mentor Network. Brian leads the placement side: firm fit, callback preparation, and introductions across Big Law. He ran that side of a firm from the inside, which is the only reason we are building it.
Some people lose ten points in the room that they never lose in practice.
Lovare is running a study with Dr. Ian Lyons in the Department of Psychology at Georgetown University, under an approved IRB protocol, on test anxiety and LSAT performance. The question is narrow and practical: which interventions actually recover points under pressure, measured rather than assumed.
Performance under pressure, not therapy, and nothing there is treatment. What comes out of it goes into how students are prepared for a timed room, and it gets published whichever way it lands.
How we work
No public client lists and no posts about wins. Drafts and notes stay in a private workspace, NDAs are available on request, and results go out as medians with dates and cohort size rather than as names.
One point of contact for everything, daytime replies within a day, and a calm week before a test or an interview where things get removed rather than added.
You will leave knowing where you actually stand and the two or three moves that matter from here, whether or not you work with us. If the honest answer is to wait a year, you will hear that too.
The method is only as good as the person teaching it.
LSAT tutors
A selective team trained in Lovare's structured LSAT methodology and one-on-one teaching standards.
Olivia brings more than 100 hours of teaching experience across reading, writing, and quantitative subjects. Her approach is clear and disciplined, with an emphasis on helping students understand difficult reasoning and perform consistently under pressure.
Jessica has direct one-on-one LSAT tutoring experience and a strong record of helping students identify and correct specific performance gaps, including supporting a student's improvement from the mid-160s to a 173.
Jimmy brings substantial tutoring experience to Lovare alongside a 175 LSAT score. His teaching background and analytical approach make him a strong fit for Lovare's structured, diagnostic method of one-on-one LSAT instruction.